Posted by: theoptimisticconservative | May 11, 2011

S. 679: To Remove “Advise and Consent” Function of Senate for Numerous Federal Appointments

This, introduced by Chuck Schumer on 30 March 2011, looks like a very, very bad idea, from the perspective of anyone who wants government to be smaller and less intrusive – and wants the executive to be policed better by the legislative branch.  President Obama and his czars are the obvious counterargument to this bill.  They make a powerful one.

More than 200 appointed positions would be excused from the advise-and-consent requirement by S. 679.  Among them are the following:

  • ·         The Agriculture Department’s Commodities Credit Board
  • ·         Agriculture’s Rural Utilities Service Administrator
  • ·         The Chief Scientist of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • ·         The Commerce Department’s Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information
  • ·         The Defense Department’s Assistant Secretary for Networks and Information Integration
  • ·         The Assistant Secretaries of each of the armed services for financial management
  • ·         The Education Department’s Assistant Secretary for Management
  • ·         Education’s Commissioner of Education Statistics
  • ·         All 7 of the Assistant Secretaries of Energy
  • ·         The Department of Homeland Security’s Director of the Office of Domestic Preparedness
  • ·         Homeland Security’s Assistant Administrator of FEMA for Grant Programs
  • ·         The Department of the Treasury’s Assistant Secretary for Management and Chief Financial Officer
  • ·         The Treasurer of the United States
  • ·         Director of the US Mint
  • ·         The Governors and Alternate Governors of the International Monetary Fund and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (amending Section 3 of the Bretton Woods Agreements Act)
  • ·         Governor and Alternate Governor of the Asian Development Bank (amending Section 3(a) of the Asian Development Bank Act)
  • ·         Governor and Alternate Governor of the African Development Fund (amending Section 203(a) of the African Development Fund Act)
  • ·         Managing Director of the Corporation for National and Community Service
  • ·         The Office of Management and Budget’s Controller, Office of Federal Financial Management
  • ·         Director of the Community Development Financial Institution Fund

That’s just a sample – and it represents an awful lot of policy, money-handling, and benefit-management, with your tax dollars.  The Senate proposes to let the president appoint people to these positions without explicit prior oversight.  The sheer possibilities for graft and bribery here are colossal – and that’s before we even get to the possibilities for covert policy implementation.

The Senate may be naïve enough to think presidents “should” simply be trusted to appoint honest brokers to these positions.  With the Obama administration’s record of attempting one executive end-run after another around due-process law, such senatorial sentiment seems like willful stupidity.  But Obama is not the first president to appoint questionable individuals to second-tier federal positions.  There is a long history of problems or perceived problems in this area of executive privilege.  And that’s the point of consensual government, checks and balances, and separation of powers.

The list in S. 679 includes all the legislative affairs directors for the federal departments, which would mean that a president’s appointees to these positions would be entirely loyal to him, not Congress.  Add that to all the key positions in which money or statistics could be mishandled behind the scenes.  (The Chief Scientist for NOAA could well be the most important appointment in the US federal government these days.  The Commodity Credit Board and the Community Development Financial Institution Fund would be extremely efficient vote-buying vehicles in the wrong hands.  The skullduggery that could result from unreviewed appointments to the IMF and the Asian and African development funds doesn’t bear thinking about.)

Now is not the time to express this kind of confidence in the executive.  In fact, the case is the exact opposite.  In terms of political administration, S. 679 would be a good head start on turning all of America into Chicago.  Here are the Republicans who co-sponsored it with Chuck Schumer:

Alexander (TN)

Brown (MA)

Collins (ME)

Johanns (NE)

Kyl (AZ)

Lugar (IN)

McConnell (KY)

The Heritage Foundation has a good write-up.  H/t:  NoisyRoom.

J.E. Dyer’s articles have appeared at Hot Air’s Green Room, Commentary’s “contentions,Patheos, and The Weekly Standard online.


  1. The most dangerous place in the world isn’t deep in a Bolivian mine or the roller coaster at the Kabul Disneyland, it’s the spot between Chuckie Schumer and a microphone. If he’s in favor of it, it has to be a bad idea.

    Aside from that, the first three examples on your list really shouldn’t need advise and consent. There shouldn’t even be such positions, or departments, for that matter. Agri-business has access to no end of information, from private businesses and educational institutions, close down the Department of Agriculture. The work of the NOAA is duplicated by radio and TV stations all over the country. Get rid of it. The Commerce Department? I’ve never met anybody that’s ever had anything to do with it. Make their employees redundant now.

  2. cm — I agree that the great majority of these positions should be done away with (and many of their federal departments with them).

    But while they exist, they absolutely require vetting by the Senate. The people in them could do grave harm to our liberties.

  3. stuff and nonsense.

    these aren’t senior positions and congress exercises plenty of control over the executive branch when it seriously wishes to get exercised.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: